semiAIfoundry

Portfolio / Connected pursuits

Expanding what can be discovered, built, and put to work.

Our work connects the possibilities of computation, the control of intelligent systems, and the demands of consequential execution. These pursuits inform one another; they are not sequential stages.

Computation and realization

What can a computation become, and which possibilities must remain open?

Formal foundations and engineering systems that connect computational intent to physical realization, without erasing choices the future may still need.

Intelligent agency and control

How should intelligence reason, learn, and acquire the authority to act?

Architectures that connect cognition, evidence, and learning while keeping consequential action subject to a distinct, accountable control plane.

Domain-native execution

How does frontier capability become work that meets real-world requirements?

Platforms that bring domain expertise, evidence, decisions, and accountability into the operating core of consequential work.

Realization defines the choices. Agency governs action. Execution supplies the requirements that sharpen both.

Research in the Open

Computation and realization / CRG

Computation–Realization Geometry

A formal theory of how computation becomes physical, developed into a system for preserving valid chip-design choices and governing safe commitment.

One framework connects computation, legal transformations, realization geometry, safe commitment, and the CRG System.

The theoretical contribution

A formal map. A law for commitment. A working system.

01

Realization geometry

CRG maps valid physical realizations of a computation and the joint constraints across movement, state, work, latency, replication, ownership, and hierarchy.

02

Safe-Commitment Law

An option may be discarded only when no decision still ahead could tell that it was gone. The law makes premature loss of a viable design path testable.

03

CRG System

The operational system registers alternatives, computes their obligations, and issues auditable, independently verifiable certificates for commitment and change.

Six manuscriptsFormal theory, proofs, and extensions
Public validationBenchmarks, negative controls, and reproducibility
CRG System v1.5.0Operational software and integration interfaces
Explore the theory, evidence, and system

Foundational research / Agentic intelligence

The Agentic Brain

Evidence changes what an agent believes—and what it is permitted to do.

An AI agent can choose which checks to run, which evidence to seek, and when to stop reasoning. When those choices also shape its permission to act, cognition and governance become one coupled control problem.

The Agentic Brain connects fast inference, deliberation, verification, and protected authority through an agentic control plane. Formal results and executable finite-model validation examine the incentives this coupling creates, the evidence required for valid admission, and the boundary between permission and external effect.

· Preprint v1.0.0 · Open access

The Agentic Brain: Evidence changes both belief and permission. Fast cognition and deliberation interact through a cognitive router that selects checks and updates beliefs. Shared evidence informs a separately protected authority gate, which receives policy constraints, returns permission feedback, and authorizes external action. Better reasoning is not permission.
Cognitive modes and a separately protected authority gate share evidence and feedback. Explore the architecture and validation
01

Cognition and authority

Value-of-computation analysis separates improved beliefs, changes in admissible actions, and their interaction.

02

Selection-valid evidence

Assurance must remain valid for the checks an agent can select. Complete logging alone cannot repair a verifier blind spot.

03

Governed execution

Single-use authorizations bind permission to the operation that actually runs. Faster competence does not automatically confer authority.

Explore the research and full paper

Product platform

FabQEDTM

Fab-grade orchestration platform for semiconductor suppliers.

A fab-impacting escalation is a business-critical event: yield, revenue, customer trust, and operational credibility are at stake. Affected material may still be moving as containment, shipment, qualification, and customer decisions remain live. Yet the response is fragmented across inboxes, spreadsheets, quality records, and engineering tools. Teams reconstruct exposure, reconcile facts, and chase owners while the impact can deepen.

FabQED orchestrates the response, not just the case file. One governed record connects the signal and affected scope to containment, investigation, evidence, accountable actions, reviewed customer updates, and signed closure. Teams can see what is known, what remains open, and who owns the next decision. Built for semiconductor supplier workflows across CMP, patterning, and advanced packaging, with AI assisting while people retain decision and communication authority.

01CaptureSignal and scope
02ContainExposure and controls
03InvestigateCauses and evidence
04ExecuteOwners and decisions
05CloseProof and prevention
Start a conversation

Discuss a scientific, technological, or execution challenge.

Use the contact page to share the relevant context.

Contact us